Trump Calls Time On Russia, Russia, Russia!
The globalist matrix has relocated its epicentre from the USA to Europe. A new Carousel of disinformation has been commissioned. This will not end well.
Electrifying television. Trump calls time on the EU-CIA perpetual war
It has been a month of genuine setbacks and even vulnerability for the Deep State. The alien-like creature from the sci-fi-horror film—part FBI, part CIA—has split. Those who wish to sit it out—after all, a second Trump term can only last four years—have buried themselves deeper in the bowels of the unelected federal government. They believe they are beyond the detection of the Department of Government Efficiency.
The onslaught on the former permanent federal bureaucracy, led by Elon Musk, is preoccupying the American media, which is off its game, primarily because its funding sources, stories, and second jobs are simultaneously threatened.
This is not some beleaguered police precinct in an urban American black community awash with crime and drug dealers that is threatened with “defunding”. The liberal would be championing cuts in police in those lawless enclaves. This is much more serious. The media and Democrats have leapt to the defence of the federal workers and Non-Governmental Organizations because their wives, husbands, friends, and political networks are therefore earmarked for defunding.
But the CIA and FBI standouts who ran the Biden Government, sometimes in the open, mainly in the shadows, worry that underestimating Trump could lead to two terms for Vice President JD Vance. This might result in a significant strategic setback to all their designs and regime change shenanigans, not to mention their absolute institutional power.
As the CIA has run foreign policy since the assassination of JF Kennedy, it is their “home ground”, the arena they are as confident in as they are in the studied arts of toppling elected governments and blackmailing friends and enemies alike with photographs of their sexual peccadilloes. They simply cannot accept that Donald Trump, whom they have consistently underestimated, and his motley cabinet can be in charge of their government.
So, while every federal department will lead its own resistance, they have relocated the base of operations to NATO and summoned their assets, agents, and even Heads of State in the European Union to EU summits and gatherings to mold the resistance abroad and thereby derail the Trump peace plan.
The Ukraine war is still championed as just and winnable. Even the British Reform Party cannot resist waving the blue and yellow flag. And who can resist a Putin-Hitler Cancer story? Not The Telegraph, The Guardian, The Times, or The Independent. Not the BBC.
These legacy media outlets have reluctantly started to acknowledge the Covid lockdown disaster and even discuss the efficacy and safety of the mRNA jabs. Zero Carbon’s bipartisan support is teetering - UK utility bills, already among the highest in the world, are set to rise dramatically - but the media has completely failed to face the realities of the Russo-Ukraine war. However, to understand their Hivemind, you must understand the media establishment's response to Donald Trump's emergence, and this is where I bring in my own model: The Carousel.
Go to any fairground, and you will still find a romantic carousel with wooden horses, happy children and nostalgic parents gliding slowly around. Surrounded by family members or friends with smartphones trying to time photographs of their loved one’s reemergence at every turn.
When he ran for the presidency and throughout his first term, I noticed that stories critical of the Trump leadership would recycle in and out of the press with coordinated soundbites across virtually all the mainstream media, often including identical phrasing.
Allow three or even six months, and the same narrative would recycle again and again, amplified across the channels, bounced through YouTube and Twitter, and saturating the international airwaves. Let’s see if I can recall the stories.
Trump claims all Mexicans were rapists, Trump was an antisemite, Trump was a serial rapist, Trump was in it for the money, Trump was no multi-billionaire but rather a tax dodger, Trump would cage “dreamer” “undocumented” children, Trump belittled the physically disabled. Trump was demented, emotional and driven by vanity; Trump would start a third world war, Trump believed there were “good Nazis”, Trump recommended drinking bleach to cure covid.
There were many others, but the stand-out ones were that Trump would destroy NATO because he was a poodle of Putin, and that was why Putin had “rigged” the 2016 election on Trump's behalf. The was the Russia Collusion hoax.
In the early days, when I was intrigued by and even warming to Trump's signature messages, I felt obliged to investigate these accusations to check if I was in error and if he was indeed the incarnation of evil. After establishing that all allegations were false, I also noted that the media would reluctantly acknowledge this, only for them to rerun the stories again and again.
For example, after nearly two years of a costly DOJ enquiry, when former FBI head Robert Mueller was testifying to Congress on the findings of his report and was explicitly asked if there was any evidence of Donald Trump colluding with the Russians, he said no. Something everyone with a brain cell had worked out.
The whole of Russia! Russia! Russia! collusion story was a great big nothing burger. But as we speak, the same thing is happening now, albeit within a new European Carousel, working across multiple languages and media companies. Let’s see if we can tease out the individual runners and riders:
The first is “Full-scale invasion”, then “Churchill versus appeasement”, with “Putin is Hitler”, and “the end of NATO”. Did I say “Full-scale invasion”? “Trump is Putin’s poodle”, “Trump is obsessed with money (rare mineral contracts)”, “Putin is a Liar”, “Trump is an emotional buffoon”, “Trump is captured by Putin “disinformation”.
There was also a “Full-scale invasion”, and “Starmer and Zelensky are Churchill”, “Trump is mad!”, and let us not to forget the “Full-scale invasion”, “Trump not Zelensky is the dictator”, and as the British BBC amplify all these talking points they also find time to recycle the Hamas “Health ministry” propaganda: “Palestinians innocent victims” and the victims of a “genocide”. And so on. But wait, a new late entry, “Peacekeeper Back-Stop.”
This is not just the tabloids but the mainstream media, broadsheets, and “experts”. Many opinion page writers have written some of the most rabid, hysterical articles, and our TV and radio news is no better. The cornerstone of the narrative is that the Russians can never be trusted to honour any peace deal, and the USA must “back up” any European peacekeepers militarily.
The European leaders gathering to flesh out their plans live in this carousel world. They think they can get the President of the United States to abandon the signature political commitment on which he won a staggered second term.
One thing you will not find in the British press and the coverage in English from the continent is anyone explaining that the Ukrainians have lost the war, the Russians are advancing, and that the only way to escalate the war is to risk NATO troops on the ground and a potential nuclear exchange.
Take “Full-Scale Invasion.” It is everywhere in articles, interviews, opening paragraphs on radio news and TV summaries. Retired generals and intelligence agency officials are all telling us there was a “Full-Scale Invasion” when, in fact, this was not the case. The Russian special military operation initially deployed 90,000 troops, which was utterly inadequate for any attempt to overrun Ukraine.
No one is rewarded for pointing out the flaws in the narratives dominating this postmodern age. Nominally intelligent commentators parrot the same integrated email sound bites. Unwinnable wars are now mandatory. And those most vociferous in championing them have no intention of signing up to participate in the fighting. Someone else must fight them; someone else must die.
The green movement once championed peace, but now, its political parties are the most passionate supporters of perpetual war. Those previous generations that participated in the horrors of the continental wars are long since buried. Those who know far better are accused of appeasement, and those who advocate discussions with Moscow are now denounced as quislings.
Defence secretaries with dwindling, minuscule armed forces call for final pushes to victory by an utterly shattered Ukrainian nation. The EU talks of fighting without an arms industry or an economy or tax base able to finance one. Indeed, in England, key sections of our vital policymakers are obsessed with waging a fictitious war on carbon dioxide that can only be accomplished by stripping out the carbon-based industries vital for any conventional war effort. All is fantasy; all is contradictory.
So, what was going on in the electrifying encounter between Zelensky Trump and Vice President J.D. Zance? Firstly, we need to go back in time. Zelenskyy suggested a rare mineral contract to the US Congress last autumn before Trump was reelected. The proposal was to use the dubious deal as collateral to resume military and financial support for the war.
Fast forward: now the UK and France, along with the CIA Neocons' "resistance" and various EU leaders, actually want to keep the war going. Trump wants to end the war, salvage what's realistic for Ukraine, end the CIA Putin regime change fantasy, normalise relations with Russia, and, from a position of strength, achieve Detente with China.
For those paying attention, the Russian military strategy is racking up success after success; Ukraine is on its knees economically and militarily, bereft of new troops and costing billions a week to prop up the Ukrainian state. Not to mention the endemic corruption and the laundering of weaponry and supplies.
Any peace deal in these circumstances will have to accept that the four occupied Ukrainian areas, like the already-annexed Crimea - most of which have ethnic Russian Ukrainian majorities, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson- will have to be ceded to Russia. A better deal with them remaining in Ukraine with heightened autonomy was on the table in April 2022, but Boris Johnson talked Zelensky out of it.
A demilitarised zone covering parts of Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and possibly Odesa will be essential. Ukraine itself will need to reduce its armed forces so Russia is never threatened again, and NATO membership is ruled out. EU membership is possible, but someone must pay to rebuild Ukraine.
This was obvious when the Russian economy did not collapse under the huge sanction package but, in fact, grew. Russia started to increase its troops in the autumn of 2022 and 2023. The Ukrainian Kerson counteroffensive and the Kursk incursions have all come to nothing.
Trump saw the raw mineral “proposal” as a way of paying off the US tab and building a joint trade and industrial project between Ukraine, the USA, and Russia. Thus, all parties would have an incentive for peace: a non-military “backstop,” which might also finance rebuilding the devastated towns and cities.
Trump knows the proposals solidifying in the EU, with risky French and UK "peacekeepers", come from the total war lobby coordinated by the CIA standouts - the idea would be to rearm Ukraine and then provoke or fabricate a violation and restart the war, this time drawing the USA into the conflict directly. If Trump agrees to military “backstops”, this would be a NATO article 5 by the back door and lead to a dramatic escalation.
Trump and his inner circle were not keen on Zelensky coming to the White House; now you can see the way. The Macron visit and the Starmer follow-up laid the ground for the backstop proposal, and the Zelensky debacle was preplanned.
The issues that Zelensky focused on - that the war was unprovoked and that Putin can never be trusted to abide by any agreement- are both untrue. It was successive Ukrainian governments that broke the Minsk Accords. And, of course, if you accept Zelensky’s position, there can be no peace negotiations.
Zelensky has always been a volatile figure, coked up and in a desperate position, not wholly of his own making. Johnson, Truss, Merkel, Biden, and many others have egged him along this route doomed to failure. Ukraine cannot beat Russia on its own.
The EU lacks any military capability and can only offer money increasingly in the form of loans that the Ukrainians cannot repay. Only the American military and troops on the ground could turn the tide, but should America agree to this, it would quickly escalate into a nuclear exchange.
The goal of the CIA standouts that are coordinating much of this is to undermine Trump in the eyes of the only electorate that matters, the American electorate, which is tired of the war, suspicious of the Zelensky and the corruption in Ukraine and fearful of a third world war.
This explains why, despite Trump being clear that he wants a genuine peace deal with Putin and an end to the war, Macron and Starmer have ignored this and returned to their own countries and are now immersed in the CIA-coordinated alternate EU proposal.
If Trump's peace plan is slowed or derailed, the pressure on EU countries to pay more for defence might be minimised, and the war can drag on. Or so they think. The exact opposite scenario is more likely.
The hubris on the EU leaders’ part is staggering. President Trump won a huge election victory on precisely the opposite mandate. The old anti-American sense of intellectual superiority abounds.
Meanwhile, the British media, like the rest of the continent, is full of crazy talk of European countries developing their military industrial capacity and conscripting their population whilst claiming that Trump is seeking to break up NATO. The momentum behind this, ostensibly led by Starmer and Macron and coordinated by CIA operatives, all relies on the rascally Trump backing down. He will not.
He has already frozen all military support to Ukraine, and Elon Musk has been asked to look into how the previously supplied funding has been used. The Ukrainian slush fund and corruption will be exposed. And as this unfolds, the Russian military campaigns will continue to go from success to success.
The regime change that the global political class fantasises about involves hobbling President Trump’s peace plan, leading to a Democrat-led backlash at the midterms. But if Biden's administration knew it could not commit ground troops or “backstops “ to European or British forces, what makes them think President Trump will?
It is far more likely that Starmer, Macron, and many other European leaders, however fortified by majorities or proportional representation parliaments, will face the wrath of the White House, and the rapid collapse of their machinations.
Well written as usual, and I agree with your summary